How Happy could Gay Men be in a Homophobic Society such as Ours Essay Example for Free

How Happy could Gay Men be in a Homophobic Society much(prenominal) as Ours Essay oddity is no longer an undisclosed theme amongst us, and their existence in our society is no longer a question to be raised. As we know, they enrol the aforesaid(prenominal) shops we visit every now and then they ride the same buses and sub vogues we catch they walk the same streets we tread everyday they breathe the same air we do, all for one appargonnt reason they atomic number 18 no less human than any of us in this society could possibly be. Despite the harsh knowledge we all carry ab give absent the existence of these spate who suddenly came out from the box, it still raises contrastive reactions from the crowd of the so called normal raceas the society itself may refer to it. While others have learned to concur the given fact that there is a possibility of alteration to the socially dress circle standard of normality, such as this one on the area of gender, there are still wha tever who scarcely couldnt practice the act of coexistence with these so called new breeds. There are still people who religiously believe that the defiance of the norm such as crossing from one gender to other is absolutely unacceptable. Given this reality, a lot of onslaughts have been do to somehow sway these people out of their enclosed bubbles. Even media, one of the most influential ele handsts in our society, took a step further by recognizing the existence of cheerys and lesbians in their projects themed after different slices of life equivalent the top notching series Will approval, and the award-winning movie Philadelphia.With peoples warm embrace with the idea in despicable pictures, it seemed no far from the possibility that they could, one way or another, welcome the idea in reality with open harness the only question remaining is how wide open could these people extend their arms based on what their televisions feed them? According to Marisa Conolly on her ar ticle entitled Homosexuality on Television The Heterosexualization of Will Grace in Print Media, despite the television show Will Graces attempt to gain the normality of the existence of dauntless men in the society, the show wasnt able to fully relieve the misunderstood bunch.Intentionally or not, certain limitations have been set by the said show, leaving excess provisions among viewers which they could refer to in terms of classifying homosexuality unacceptable and acceptable for the publics eyes. Generally, Will, one of the main characters of the said show who happens to play a part of a supposed homosexual, was somehow portrayed in a heterosexual manner his mere association with Grace, a straight female character, shades the scene to a different color.Their supposed friendship was brought into a different heterosexual hem in of relationship, wherein platonic is brought into a twisted romantic anglesomehow portraying him caught in between the certainty of homosexuality and the tendency to lean on heterosexuality. Unfortunately, their possible interest to sell is totally negating the promotion of the other, and then making it more complicated for the viewers whether to absorb him as a subtle brave who simply seeks intuition, or as a male, in the middle of an identity crisis, still clinging on the idealism of heterosexuality through tricky dramatization of his relationship with a straight woman.The same idea was raised in the film Philadelphia by Jonathan Demme. On the said movie, instead weighing through the inconsistency of the perceived pattern of character, the viewers are simply creation caught in the middle of a life and death situation. sort of of making their viewers understand the real score within the extent of reality that the film itself is providing, they are subconsciously redefining pity as a substitute for this understanding. They have misused the forthcoming of death to the gay personas advantage by playing on it as if sayin g Hey, I am dying now of AIDS, and I am gay.Now that I go away be leaving this venomous place soon, will you please have the compassion of accepting me for who I really am? Personally, I dont think that this is the proper way of educating the people because it is basically misleading. Though the two groups are closely knitted by its constant reception of seclusion from the society, it is unfair to define being gay no different from having AIDS. Being gay is not a deadly viral disease like AIDS it is simply a way of life that is, more often than not, being misunderstood.Upon watching the film, I was left caught at the vagueness of Denzel Washingtons character. I thought at first that he will be the one responsible to set free Tom Hanks character, but by the end of the film, my hopes were dropped on the floor. His supposed homophobia, which I first thought will be the vital element he has as one of the lead character, somehow got lost in the latter part of the story. The issue tack led dealt mainly on Hanks viral illness and how most people generally react to itgiving the homosexuality issue, which is more far-flung in reality, a weak standpoint.The common ground between the two different portrayals of gay men stated above is its tendency to seek for conditions before actually opening the idea of acceptance. For television sitcom Will Grace, they sought for a subtle way to conform with the norms by partially heterosexualizing the gay character, go for the movie Philadelphia, they played with emotions, most specifically guilt, by bringing into their attention that death is an uneventful afterlife for the character.Basically, in their own particular ways, they are always looking for certain loop holes to pull complete gayness acceptablemeaning gayness itself defines no reason to stand on its own. In this case, their noncritical viewers tend to get accustomed in looking for such passages before they actually accept certain circumstances, which unfortunately not every gay man has. In the end, publication of ideas and slices of life such as these only implies that as time passed by the society is still keeping its doors closed to the recognition of homosexualitys existence.Again it only shows the greatest weakness that any society has a aid of the un ordinary. They are not exactly liberation but rather a form of deception in order to switch the attention of the critical public regarding their claim for ample recognition to homosexuals. None of these moving images placed a dot at the end of the statement we accept homosexuality instead, they only made the issue more complex than ever by adding up the condition if and only if to the said declaration. If the shows themselves couldnt accept the fact that gay men exist, how could their viewers do?I could give credit for the attempt pull out gays and lesbians from their malicious-satirical stereotype of simply being unpleasant, loud and mischievous, but still, that doesnt make it ample for me. Compassion may be the best way to seek approval, but seeking proofs out of the ordinary and passing it off as the best solution is nothing but a substandard achievement. Homosexuality isnt actually an issue seeking for a special treatment that will be way too much for a goal now that it couldnt even reach the approval of being lined up on the average level.All gays and lesbians need is the chance to be treated in a normal wayno more and no less than how people accept heterosexualswhere in they are not shoved away as if they are infectious beasts. Since media started this crooked representation of homosexuality on screen in the first place, I believe that they will be the only one who could be this. Next time they produce best selling stories about homosexuals on their reels, they should try taking away those special cases that tend to sensationalize their storieslike exploring Wills manly side as a gay man and Hanks incurable illness.If they want to represent gay men as part of the normal welkin in our society, then they could probably represent them as simple as being another hospitable neighbor from the block without a semi-romantic relationship with a straight female, but rather a chance(a) relationship with another man, or a successful lawyer who need not die at the end of the story just to gain recognition for his success as a lawyer instead, he could just be another lawyer who saved the dayroles as simple as that, just like most heterosexuals portray.In that way, it will seem to be more realistic and fair for these people who usually live under the shadow of our judgmental society.